The gvhd Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the gvhd Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The gvhd and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View gvhd content recommended for you
Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is commonly used either in combination with infliximab or monotherapy as second- or third-line therapy for patients with graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) who are dependent or refractory to steroids. Ioanna Sakellari et al. from George Papanikolaou Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece, prospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of ECP as a second- or third-line treatment in patients with GvHD treated at their center. The study was published ahead of print in the Journal of Clinical Apheresis.
The primary endpoints of the study included overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were incidences of infections during early post-transplant period and transplant-related mortality (TRM).
In summary, this study indicates that ECP is safe and effective for the treatment of GvHD, especially if it is administered early. The study group stated that “because available data do not favor one agent for second-line therapy of GVHD above another, our results suggest that its choice should be based on potential toxicity, physician experience, and availability of the treatment.”
References